Re: obsolete indexing method "rtree"

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de>
Cc: Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: obsolete indexing method "rtree"
Date: 2020-08-18 16:44:55
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYPae--kFScLeRznxUhCh6VGbiGDsSokO_z=fOp7g7m-Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 8:46 AM Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de> wrote:

>
> On 06.08.20 10:12, David G. Johnston wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:18 AM Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de> wrote:
>
>>
>> > Why?
>>
>> Because it can hinder the learning process.
>
>
>
> Such a "make current" patch that covers this complaint seems reasonable;
> IOW, why not if you are in there anyway - rtree has some baggage and no
> particular merit such that a different label would be worse.
>
>
> Patch with four additional comments and one modified comment attached.
>
Works for me.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2020-08-18 17:08:09 Re: need for "see also" section or similar thing at hub pages
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2020-08-18 14:58:51 Re: Request for further clarification on synchronous_commit