Quick Links

Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade

From:	"David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:	Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:	Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade
Date:	2022-04-15 21:18:34
Message-ID:	CAKFQuwYJd2yaWNR6eJqGtgJG5ehy+ScwpwAhzToSFp1ipBq=qw@mail.gmail.com
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-general

On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 2:04 PM Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> but have not found a combination of name/args for genome_threshold_mono(text,text,double
> precision)
>
>
Per the fine documentation:

\df[anptwS+] [ pattern [ arg_pattern ... ] ]

So the correct formulation is:

\df genome_threshold_mono text text 'double precision'

You need to quote the fourth argument to protect the embedded space as a
character and not an argument separator.

David J.

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Tom Lane	2022-04-15 21:20:24	Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade
Previous Message	Rob Sargent	2022-04-15 21:04:12	Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade