Re: Possibly hard-to-read message

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possibly hard-to-read message
Date: 2025-03-27 01:42:11
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYJLJvt17eSAtxeBLngNrEzQD+kU4GpP7HwcupmL_NbmQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 6:34 PM David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
>> I pondered mentioning the 2s interval but the environment variable itself
> doesn't have a default, it's either set or unset which determines whether
> it provides the default or not. IMO, adding this detail produces too much
> text for little benefit.
>
>
On second thought, something like:

WATCH_INTERVAL: an integer number of seconds; overrides the default two
second \watch interval

(not quite happy but it's close...keeps the 2s reference point)

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-03-27 01:50:53 Re: Query ID Calculation Fix for DISTINCT / ORDER BY and LIMIT / OFFSET
Previous Message Yurii Rashkovskii 2025-03-27 01:38:50 Re: Add Postgres module info