Re: starting PG command line options vs postgresql.con

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: rakeshkumar464 <rakeshkumar464(at)outlook(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: starting PG command line options vs postgresql.con
Date: 2017-10-30 14:08:07
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYHHd_UDR7OwhbCkw0H-7=kP9k1otrS187dd_ag-mospQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:48 AM, rakeshkumar464 <rakeshkumar464(at)outlook(dot)com>
wrote:

> I would prefer using postgresql.conf. what is the consensus in this forum
> regarding command line vs postgresql.conf.

​I suspect that most people administering a PostgreSQL database would
expect that the configuration file would be changed in lieu of passing
options via the command line.

Also if conflicting, which one
> takes priority.
>

​https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/config-setting.html#AEN32498​

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Farber 2017-10-30 14:21:11 Re: Comparing epoch to timestamp
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-10-30 13:59:27 Re: starting PG command line options vs postgresql.con