| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Shapiro <mshapiro51(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: support for ltree |
| Date: | 2015-06-12 13:17:10 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYGXw6userbRw90ZGf8EOY42UAAro89C=82yf2ACST3Vw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Friday, June 12, 2015, Michael Shapiro <mshapiro51(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Melvin,
>
> Thanks for this response. It still leave my question unanswered. I should
> rephrase it -- will <ltree> become a native datatype in Postgres (as
> opposed to remaining an extension). Are there any plans to make <ltree> a
> native datatype?
>
Instead of asking people to guess about the future why don't you explain
what motivated you to ask the question in the first place?
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2015-06-12 13:33:37 | Re: support for ltree |
| Previous Message | Michael Shapiro | 2015-06-12 13:09:06 | Re: support for ltree |