From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CASE WHEN idiomatic for functions with side-effect? |
Date: | 2021-01-12 14:45:12 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYFMetu-nb2gzSAco07+xcv8ZKA8ZTziS7ZU=aLRywwYw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 1:14 AM Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org> wrote:
> Is it idiomatic and safe to use
>
> SELECT
> CASE boolean_expression WHEN TRUE THEN function_with_side_effects() END
>
As long as function_with_side_effects() is defined volatile it is forced to
be executed at runtime, once per row. That situation is always protected
by the case expression.
> "related cases that don't obviously involve constants can occur in queries
> executed within functions, since the values of function arguments and local
> variables can be inserted into queries as constants for planning purposes.
> Within PL/pgSQL functions, for example, using an IF-THEN-ELSE statement to
> protect a risky computation is much safer than just nesting it in
> a CASE expression."
>
> The affected real code:
> https://github.com/truthly/uniphant/blob/rls/FUNCTIONS/api/verify_assertion.sql
>
The relevant function takes in a column argument - it is thus impossible
for the planner to evaluate the expression. And, as above, the planner
respects the "volatile" attribute of functions.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-01-12 14:48:27 | Re: CASE WHEN idiomatic for functions with side-effect? |
Previous Message | Голубева Яна | 2021-01-12 08:20:59 | Re: Define hash partition for certain column values |