From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "robert(dot)j(dot)greig(at)gmail(dot)com" <robert(dot)j(dot)greig(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #18583: jsonb_populate_record return values cannot be queried correctly in subselects |
Date: | 2024-08-15 18:30:08 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYDf41N4a-HzCtOzdvUXgUWCMTMFNDsN0hoA3ksMYHbBw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Wednesday, August 14, 2024, PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 18583
> Logged by: Robert Greig
> Email address: robert(dot)j(dot)greig(at)gmail(dot)com
> PostgreSQL version: 16.4
> Operating system: Windows
> Description:
>
> create type test_simple_type as (
> f1 varchar(20),
> f2 int
> );
>
> where val is not null;
>
> It is not obvious to me why it is not working but I believe this is a
> defect
> and I can't find a workaround.
>
The “workaround” is to write that test: not (val is null)
The meaning of is not null for a composite is non-intuitive and usually not
what you want - i.e., true only if all fields are also non-null.
The docs do cover this, and there is a pending patch to further expand on
how null values are handled in various places in PostgreSQL.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kuntal Ghosh | 2024-08-15 19:31:49 | Re: BUG #18559: Crash after detaching a partition concurrently from another session |
Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2024-08-15 17:52:32 | Re: TLS session tickets disabled? |