From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464a3(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: What is the general opinion on use of tablespaces |
Date: | 2016-06-10 17:20:27 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYDYwpD3Tzyawt4CdDs023FuqPdJwPt=zaASfNGty-zXg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464a3(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> > Their main problem to overcome when using them is that they tie
> PostgreSQL
> > much more tightly to the underlying configuration of the operating system
> > and thus you need to ensure that your processes and procedures
> accommodate
> > that reality since the tools that PostgreSQL provides can only do so
> much.
>
> Are you specifically referring to the restore process.
>
>
Yes
> Tablespaces help distributing large tables in different file systems.
>
Can you be more precise? A single table can only be placed onto one file
system.
Only if those different file systems have different physical
characteristics is using a tablespace likely to be a good solution. In
other scenarios having some kind of virtual file system overlay at the O/S
level and exposed to PostgreSQL is probably a better option.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-06-10 17:31:44 | Re: What is the general opinion on use of tablespaces |
Previous Message | Rakesh Kumar | 2016-06-10 17:12:47 | Re: What is the general opinion on use of tablespaces |