| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | cyril(dot)auburtin(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | "pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: typo |
| Date: | 2017-05-17 21:47:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwY5D2aO4pQJTgC-XrdvxA9kTjYUuV16gVceLbfq0RVN2w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:13 AM, <cyril(dot)auburtin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/ddl-constraints.html
> Description:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/ddl-constraints.html#DDL-
> CONSTRAINTS-FK
>
> "If someone removes an order, the order items are removed as
> well"
>
> should be " If someone removes a product..."
>
No, the wording in the docs is accurate. It might be better to say
"implement the following two policies"...that second sentence is part of
the overall policy being described. The policy has two components which is
why both FK constraints were changed.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Toews | 2017-05-19 04:02:41 | Online docs links for 10.0 vs 10 |
| Previous Message | mjustin.lists | 2017-05-17 20:20:57 | pg_inherits documentation clarification |