From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CommandStatus from insert returning when using a portal. |
Date: | 2023-07-12 22:12:50 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwY55Qhb+1LK3jUibGXHmyH4-AAjw6dGFJP7wZeW74iX1Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 2:59 PM Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 17:49, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>> Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> > Obviously I am biased by the JDBC API which would like to have
>> > PreparedStatement.execute() return the number of rows inserted
>> > without having to wait to read all of the rows returned
>>
>> Umm ... you do realize that we return the rows on-the-fly?
>>
> I do realize that.
>
>> The server does not know how many rows got inserted/returned
>>
> Well I haven't looked at the code, but it seems unintuitive that adding
> the returning clause changes the semantics of insert.
>
>
It doesn't have to - the insertions are always "as rows are produced", it
is just that in the non-returning case the final row can be sent to
/dev/null instead of the client (IOW, there is always some destination).
In both cases the total number of rows inserted are only reliably known
when the top executor node requests a new tuple and its immediate
predecessor says "no more rows present".
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2023-07-12 22:21:34 | Re: document the need to analyze partitioned tables |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2023-07-12 21:59:29 | Re: CommandStatus from insert returning when using a portal. |