On Tuesday, March 18, 2025, 谭忠涛 <zhongtao(dot)tan(at)seaboxdata(dot)com> wrote:
> case:
> select 1 !=-1;
> select 1 !=+1;
>
>
Explain why you think it is a bug. From what I see those are potentially
valid operator names that do not exist so “operator not found” is the
correct outcome.
David J.