| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ken Tanzer <ken(dot)tanzer(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.6 parameters messing up my 9.2 pg_dump/pg_restore |
| Date: | 2017-06-28 20:10:02 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwY3xe3gKDiNYSmyMDYbSG21Hhw8sfPPiH1DY6zORpNKuQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wednesday, June 28, 2017, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
> Ken Tanzer wrote:
>
> > I didn't see any options for dealing with this, though I'm hoping I'm
> > missing something easy or obvious. Any suggestions or help would be
> > appreciated. Thanks.
>
> pg_dump doesn't promise that its output is compatible with servers older
> than itself. I'm afraid you're stuck with filtering the output somehow
> to remove or maybe comment out those lines.
>
>
Or explicitly use the 9.2 pg_dump instead of finding the 9.6 one in your
path.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-06-28 20:30:21 | Re: 9.6 parameters messing up my 9.2 pg_dump/pg_restore |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-06-28 19:52:52 | Re: 9.6 parameters messing up my 9.2 pg_dump/pg_restore |