| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Inder <robert(at)interactive(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Michael Lewis <mlewis(at)entrata(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Writing WAL files |
| Date: | 2020-10-05 19:33:24 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwY1g92Hz6RXBuYa4snMTY09ZfHwktBQi+Z+gXcfH3Zt9w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Monday, October 5, 2020, Robert Inder <robert(at)interactive(dot)co(dot)uk> wrote:
> But the change Adrian Klaverd highlighted suggests that this is
> deliberately no longer the case,
> and I am left wondering what it does, in fact do/mean now.
>
“If no WAL has been written since the previous checkpoint, new checkpoints
will be skipped even if checkpoint_timeout has passed. ‘
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/wal-configuration.html
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2020-10-05 19:34:35 | Re: UUID generation problem |
| Previous Message | James B. Byrne | 2020-10-05 19:30:01 | Re: UUID generation problem |