| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_input_error_info doc 2 exampled crammed together |
| Date: | 2024-04-29 05:07:49 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwY1YLOEgWRPd20dEqLSi8QT8uu0yBSm3=faDk99F=qW7Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sunday, April 28, 2024, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 06:45:30PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > My preference would be to limit this section to a single example. The
> > numeric one, as it provides values for more output columns. I would
> change
> > the output format to expanded from default, in order to show all columns
> > and not overrun the length of a single line.
>
> Agreed that having two examples does not bring much, so this could be
> brought to a single one. The first one is enough to show the point of
> the function, IMO. It is shorter in width and it shows all the output
> columns.
>
>
Agreed. The column names are self-explanatory if you’ve seen errors
before. The values are immaterial. Plus we don’t generally use
psql-specific features in our examples.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-04-29 05:11:00 | Re: A failure in prepared_xacts test |
| Previous Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2024-04-29 05:00:00 | Re: A failure in prepared_xacts test |