| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions |
| Date: | 2025-04-12 01:13:45 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwY0fHcq1AvU+WMaPi175pbcbrA6rO1fpvUz=kWhHLTgkw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 5:19 PM Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > WFM. Though is there a reason to avoid adding the "why" of the
> exception for n_mod_since_analyze?
>
> I did think about that. I thought it will be understood that since
> this is a field that deals with ANALYZE,
> it will be understood that only committed changes matter here, and not
> worth adding more text to the
> description. but, maybe it's worth it?
>
>
Absent field questions I'm content to think it is sufficiently obvious or
discoverable for others.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2025-04-12 02:30:21 | Re: TOAST versus toast |
| Previous Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-04-12 00:37:49 | Re: stats.sql fails during installcheck on mac |