| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vijaykumar Jain <vijaykumarjain(dot)github(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: explain vs auto_explain |
| Date: | 2024-10-19 17:50:01 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwY0SSLdm7KLmRVouXD_2=60-oOsdXfF56gx9n=bNhvWnw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 10:43 AM Vijaykumar Jain <
vijaykumarjain(dot)github(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> i tried to check the code for auto_explain , there is nothing that helps
> understand why it was provided as a separate .
>
Probably because output to log was easier than reworking the internals to
make output to client happen.
If you are interested in working on a patch to address your use case I say
go for it. Designing the inputs and outputs actually doesn't seem that
challenging, if exceptionally vulnerable to bike-shedding. But I imagine
the internals are quite a different matter.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-10-19 18:01:56 | Re: explain vs auto_explain |
| Previous Message | Vijaykumar Jain | 2024-10-19 17:43:31 | Re: explain vs auto_explain |