| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Yogi Barot <YBarot(at)symcor(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SSL question |
| Date: | 2015-08-28 14:13:11 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwY=Cjy=V-Y+U_w52McGU5cD0V6nyPNHLkpzKTKr7b5gzg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Yogi Barot <YBarot(at)symcor(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for your quick reply, but 3-7% overhead is this reasonable
>
Sounds reasonable.
or we have some issue with application?
>
Hard to say - probably not
Need to give better technical reason to management for not enabling SSL.
>
There is a business/data component to the decision as well.
Our application uses connection pooling so on daily basis only few
> connections to database.
>
>
>
What does this have to do with the question at hand?
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2015-08-28 14:22:04 | Re: Version 1202 released |
| Previous Message | Yogi Barot | 2015-08-28 13:54:34 | Re: SSL question |