| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird SQL |
| Date: | 2016-02-10 17:24:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwY+kJrDU5Re8f2kSfD3edQ+GhJc5C4Fg19M9pAj3b1xCw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:08 AM, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2/10/2016 8:51 AM, Pierre Chevalier Géologue wrote:
>
> PPS: how should I behave on this list: should I systematically "reply to
> all", or just "reply" to the list? I'm used to a number of mailing lists
> where a simple "reply" automatically replies to the list, and the rule
> obliges you to **only** use "reply".
>
>
>
> Thunderbird offers me both 'reply' and 'reply list' buttons for the
> messages on this list.
>
> most of the lists I'm on, a simple reply IS a reply list, as they wish to
> encourage discussions rather than private responses. I personally dislike
> 'reply all' as I'm ON the list so why send me another CC ?
>
>
It lets me distinguish between the list threads that I haven't responded to
and those that I have.
From observation pretty much everyone here uses reply-to-all...I suspect
for a similar reason.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yury Zhuravlev | 2016-02-10 18:09:37 | Test CMake build |
| Previous Message | ioan ghip | 2016-02-10 17:10:37 | Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird SQL |