Re: Cost Model

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: neto brpr <netobrpr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cost Model
Date: 2017-12-20 17:35:01
Message-ID: CAKFQuwY+DEZBhvgvDV+QoSabPK+UV+UqM=Y07TzAynVFxQGpTg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:29 AM, neto brpr <netobrpr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Any comment, hint about it or something, please inform me.
>

The docs contain this - its seem to cover what you describe:

​
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/runtime-config-query.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-QUERY-CONSTANTS

David J.

In response to

  • Cost Model at 2017-12-20 17:29:37 from neto brpr

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-12-20 17:42:43 Re: Letting plpgsql in on the fun with the new expression eval stuff
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-12-20 17:34:31 Re: Schema-qualify function calls in information_schema