Re: Postgresql10 Bug report. (pg_catalog.pg_statistic_ext does not exist)

From: mark <dvlhntr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgresql10 Bug report. (pg_catalog.pg_statistic_ext does not exist)
Date: 2017-04-06 18:10:05
Message-ID: CAKD=pjh1pKqwvFNHvTnmRD4oB=ic7UhiDF=Y6RaGdBxtqfVBZA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

it would appear that it didn't restart when I thought it had with the
service command.

apologies, I'm not able to reproduce anymore after restarting things.

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > mark wrote:
> >> m=# create table mytable (myid serial, mytext text);
> >> CREATE TABLE
> >> m=# \d mytable
> >> ERROR: relation "pg_catalog.pg_statistic_ext" does not exist
>
> > Ah, what happens is you're using a new psql with a pre-10 server. Yeah,
> > this is a bug since psql is supposed to work fine with older servers
> > too. Thanks for the report, will fix.
>
> No, there is a version test there, and it works fine for me. I think
> the OP is somehow using a very recent psql with a v10, but not so recent,
> server. Perhaps he didn't restart his server after updating RPMs.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2017-04-06 18:19:05 Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2017-04-06 17:47:12 Re: Implementation of SASLprep for SCRAM-SHA-256