Re: [PATCHES] Post-special page storage TDE support

From: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: David Christensen <david(dot)christensen(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Post-special page storage TDE support
Date: 2024-12-27 17:25:11
Message-ID: CAKAnmmLj_1+CmS7ZXankB3XNW5uXOXuPO5rEuREf_4x6n=MUjg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 10:12 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> The value of TDE is limited from a security value perspective, but high on
> the list of security policy requirements. Our community is much more
> responsive to actual value vs policy compliance value.
>

True. The number of forks, though, makes me feel this is a "when", not "if"
feature. Has there been any other complex feature forked/implemented by so
many? Maybe columnar storage?

Cheers,
Greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-12-27 17:30:51 Re: Connection limits/permissions, slotsync workers, etc
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2024-12-27 17:19:58 Re: [PATCHES] Post-special page storage TDE support