Re: [Feature Request] INSERT FROZEN to Optimize Large Cold Data Imports and Migrations

From: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: bokanist(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Feature Request] INSERT FROZEN to Optimize Large Cold Data Imports and Migrations
Date: 2025-02-14 16:39:41
Message-ID: CAKAnmmLdw882syy5vNwnGFjvyvtoqBNVK4iujTsNt1qpY47uUQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 1:41 AM Sébastien <bokanist(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I had huge problems on server 3 weeks after a 6 TB migration from other
> DB. I think it's sad to rewrite all data twice.
>

You could always COPY FREEZE into a new table, then move any remaining
rows, and finally rename the tables. Should be a win if the majority of the
table is newly-imported data. Another thing you might look at is increasing
your three week forced freeze window by adjusting params and/or decreasing
the number of transactions your cluster is using. (granted, still the same
overall write volume). You could also do manual vacuum freezes at a time
better for you (since you mention autovac is doing this at
unpredictable times).

Cheers,
Greg

--
Crunchy Data - https://www.crunchydata.com
Enterprise Postgres Software Products & Tech Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2025-02-14 16:47:21 Re: describe special values in GUC descriptions more consistently
Previous Message Sami Imseih 2025-02-14 16:06:15 Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions