| From: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Matthias Apitz <guru(at)unixarea(dot)de>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Subhash Udata <subhashudata(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, 김주연 <mysylph(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CVE-2024-10979 Vulnerability Impact on PostgreSQL 11.10 |
| Date: | 2024-11-23 18:30:13 |
| Message-ID: | CAKAnmmLHR_WfR0yZhU9c_vT-hTU-T+N84mEvL6tTELoMLvySfw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 1:10 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> and say bounce the database server and install the binaries. What I
> have never considered before, and I should have, is the complexity of
> doing this for many remote servers. Can we improve our guidance for
> these cases?
>
Hmm I'm not sure what else we can say. Our upgrade process is already
drop-dead-simple, especially compared to many (most?) other products out
there. People painting themselves into corners is not something we can
really help with.
Cheers,
Greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2024-11-23 18:57:16 | Re: CVE-2024-10979 Vulnerability Impact on PostgreSQL 11.10 |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2024-11-23 18:22:02 | Re: Question About Native Support for SQL:2011 Temporal Tables in PostgreSQL |