| From: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Avinash Vallarapu <avinash(dot)vallarapu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Planet Postgres and the curse of AI |
| Date: | 2024-08-20 12:32:26 |
| Message-ID: | CAKAnmmKEJO9XAVaO8JqW+33FCmH_sGKawQDv=vZ_KZMp7HWdww@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 12:45 PM Avinash Vallarapu <
avinash(dot)vallarapu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> However, I do agree with Lawrence that it is impossible to prove whether
> it is written by AI or a human.
> AI can make mistakes and it might mistakenly point out that a blog is
> written by AI (which I know is difficult to implement).
>
Right - I am not interested in "proving" things, but I think a policy to
discourage overuse of AI is warranted.
People may also use AI generated Images in their blogs, and they may be
> meaningful for their article.
> Is it only the content or also the images ? It might get too complicated
> while implementing some rules.
>
Only the content, the images are perfectly fine. Even expected, these days.
> Ultimately, Humans do make mistakes and we shouldn't discourage people
> assuming it is AI that made that mistake.
>
Humans make mistakes. AI confidently hallucinates.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2024-08-20 12:44:04 | Re: Planet Postgres and the curse of AI |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2024-08-20 11:43:13 | Re: Insert query performance |