Re: Planet Postgres and the curse of AI

From: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Planet Postgres and the curse of AI
Date: 2024-07-18 14:25:27
Message-ID: CAKAnmm+v7Rby=QKs-TCDjr42tjazcndJOPw_6pZVFadU7v9rWw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> But to what degree exactly should that be allowed?

Somewhat ironically, here's a distinction chatgpt and I came up with:

LLM-generated content: Content where the substantial part of the text is
directly created by LLMs without significant human alteration or editing.

Human-edited or reviewed content: Content that has been substantially
revised, corrected, or enhanced by a human after initial generation by
LLMs. This includes using spell and grammar checking, manual edits for
clarity or style, and content that reflects significant human input beyond
the original LLM output.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message azeem subhani 2024-07-18 17:29:46 Re: PgbackRest and EDB Query
Previous Message Ruben Morais 2024-07-18 14:03:18 Re: PgbackRest and EDB Query