Re: pg_upgrade vs. logical replication

From: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joe Wildish <joe(at)lateraljoin(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade vs. logical replication
Date: 2024-12-09 13:06:47
Message-ID: CAKAnmm+YkjX+Mvx6QOj0+3n-=jO_DiMNASLEBmHFnPe6KeErJA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 6:43 AM Joe Wildish <joe(at)lateraljoin(dot)com> wrote:
Overall, your solution seems okay, but:

> a fix has gone in to PG17 that sorts this problem.
>

> However, we can't go to 17 yet, so need a solution for 15 and 16.

Honestly, this would seem like a really, really strong reason to push for
v17.

Cheers,
Greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zacher, Stacy 2024-12-09 17:03:52 RE: tds_fdw DB-Library error: DB #: 20002, DB Msg: Adaptive Server connection failed - RESOLVED
Previous Message Joe Wildish 2024-12-09 11:42:39 pg_upgrade vs. logical replication