From: | Donald Dong <xdong(at)csumb(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Implicit make rules break test examples |
Date: | 2019-01-01 18:24:55 |
Message-ID: | CAKABAqsWzee4Q6qnkgO8UnWrDroRJnZL3f2bxxgQ+B=rpLnoZg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thank you for the explanation! That makes sense. It is strange that it does
not work for me.
> What platform are you on exactly, and what toolchain (gcc and ld
> versions) are you using?
I'm using Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS.
gcc version:
gcc (Ubuntu 7.3.0-27ubuntu1~18.04) 7.3.0
ld version:
GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.30
Regards,
Donald Dong
On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 9:54 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Donald Dong <xdong(at)csumb(dot)edu> writes:
> > In src/test/example, the implicit make rules produce errors:
>
> Hm. "make" in src/test/examples works fine for me.
>
> The only way I can account for the results you're showing is if your
> linker is preferring libpq.a to libpq.so, so that reading the library
> before the *.o files causes none of it to get pulled in. But that
> isn't the default behavior on any modern platform AFAIK, and certainly
> isn't considered good practice these days. Moreover, if that's what's
> happening, I don't see how you would have managed to build PG at all,
> because there are a lot of other places where our Makefiles write
> $(LDFLAGS) before the *.o files they're trying to link. Maybe we
> shouldn't have done it like that, but it's been working for everybody
> else.
>
> What platform are you on exactly, and what toolchain (gcc and ld
> versions) are you using?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
Donald Dong
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-01-01 19:08:30 | Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-01-01 18:03:18 | Re: shared-memory based stats collector |