replication slot to be used in the future

From: Tom DalPozzo <t(dot)dalpozzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: replication slot to be used in the future
Date: 2017-01-04 16:44:23
Message-ID: CAK77FCTOWS8XuXnaM2ZS8wwyxUiajVXZoMDzyG87dNd2AL8m5g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi,
I've got my primary and I make a pg_basebackup -x in order to create a
standby.
I can connect my standby only later, in some hours, so I'd like the master
to keep new WALs but I don't like to use archiving nor keep-segments
option. I thought to do it through a physical replication slot (my standby
will have its replication slot name).
So I create a physical replication slot but I see that the master, which
has never seen my standby connected to him, doesn't keep WALs.

Any idea?

Regards
Pupillo

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Israel Brewster 2017-01-04 16:59:04 Index impact on update?
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2017-01-04 16:39:42 Re: COPY: row is too big