From: | Dan Smith <j(dot)daniel(dot)smith1(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Understanding was terminated by signal 9: Killed |
Date: | 2021-10-20 21:00:49 |
Message-ID: | CAK50JrzVFeU8dMoQzyVwWPzwd9uYyxuck7dAWHhGQaObjS-Fkg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
I'm 100% certain you can downsize given the selected instance type is
compatible with your engine version. Process is the same as scaling up and
will result in downtime. I don't see anything in documentation regarding
AWS RDS Console, API's or Terraform documentation that would lead me to
believe it cares about anything more than having valid parameters
combinations regarless of engine / size.
Just to be certain, I created a t3.medium on my personal account with
Postgres 13.3 and resized to a t3.micro immediately after it was
provisioned. No issues.
Summary of modifications
You are about to submit the following modifications. Only values that will
change are displayed. Carefully verify your changes and click Modify DB
Instance.
AttributeCurrent valueNew value
DB instance class db.t3.medium db.t3.micro
No issues Modifying.
Best regards,
Dan Smith
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 1:27 PM Michel SALAIS <msalais(at)msym(dot)fr> wrote:
> Be careful!
> I am not sure but upgrade for a larger instance can't be temporary. I
> think you can't downgrade to the original instance class thereafter...
>
> --
> Michel SALAIS
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com>
> Envoyé : mercredi 20 octobre 2021 01:12
> À : Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> Cc : Wells Oliver <wells(dot)oliver(at)gmail(dot)com>; pgsql-admin <
> pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Objet : Re: Understanding was terminated by signal 9: Killed
>
> You could always change the size of the RDS instance to something larger
> than what it currently is running, even just temporarily.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On Oct 19, 2021, at 6:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > Wells Oliver <wells(dot)oliver(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> In an RDS instance with 16GB RAM, I ran a long query which started by
> >> setting temp_buffers to 16GB, so I think I plum ran out of memory,
> >> but can anyone point me in a different direction if the following log
> >> messages indicate something else is awry?
> >
> > Yeah, this:
> >
> >> 2021-10-19 21:10:37 UTC::@:[24752]:LOG: server process (PID 25813)
> >> was terminated by signal 9: Killed
> >
> > almost certainly indicates the Linux OOM killer at work. If you were
> > running your own system I'd point you to [1], but I doubt that RDS
> > lets you put your hands on the relevant knobs.
> >
> > regards, tom lane
> >
> > [1]
> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/kernel-resources.html#LINUX-ME
> > MORY-OVERCOMMIT
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
--
Best regards,
Dan Smith
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | sbob | 2021-10-20 21:47:29 | Can I make logical replication behave like synchronous streaming? |
Previous Message | John Scalia | 2021-10-20 20:39:04 | Re: Understanding was terminated by signal 9: Killed |