From: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgbuildfarm-members(at)lists(dot)pgfoundry(dot)org" <pgbuildfarm-members(at)lists(dot)pgfoundry(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] Assorted buildfarm members AWOL for building HEAD |
Date: | 2016-06-13 13:23:12 |
Message-ID: | CAK3UJRH6gzSo2nYv1pn5WyBOysN12jzsK+PKGcNBUHy+YTzZrQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | buildfarm-members |
> On Friday, May 13, 2016, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>> I noticed by perusing
>> http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_members.pl
>> that several animals are up-to-date on building the back branches,
>> but haven't built HEAD in some time:
>>
>> anole (72 days back)
>> castoroides (74 days back)
>> hyrax (165 days back)
>> mule (275 days back)
>> narwhal (48 days back)
>>
>> Please check that, if any of these belong to you. These critters are not
>> dead, because they've all reported on one or more back branches recently,
>> but they must be misconfigured somehow.
Sorry for a little delay, hyrax is back running HEAD builds now. The
problem seemed to be that this check was blowing up on the HEAD
branch:
since the old pgsql.build and pgsql.inst (not certain on the directory
names anymore, I've lost my terminal output since then) were hanging
around in hyrax's buildroot for HEAD. It would be nice if the
buildfarm code could detect this case. I believe I'm PGBuildFarm
running client version 4.15.1.
P.S. I never received Tom's original message to this list though I did
get three other replies in the thread. I've noticed elsewhere that
pgFoundry's mail delivery is unreliable.
Josh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Black | 2016-09-05 06:08:09 | [Pgbuildfarm-members] new build members |
Previous Message | Gael Le Mignot | 2016-05-23 07:18:03 | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] Assorted buildfarm members AWOL for building HEAD |