| From: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_restore multiple --function options |
| Date: | 2013-09-06 01:15:09 |
| Message-ID: | CAK3UJRFjNh7Nfjw3JdLsFoCp3L9Kuh-=0KevoUH7jCd+BDnCog@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
> Assuming no objections, I'll apply the attached patch to 9.3 and master
> later tonight.
Just a little stylistic nitpick: could we pluralize the --help outputs
for the modified options so that they make clear that multiple
specifications are supported. E.g. "restore named index(es)" instead
of just "restore named index". The last round of such changes tried to
make such --help tweaks, it would be nice to keep 'em consistent.
Josh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Flower | 2013-09-06 01:29:32 | Re: [PERFORM] encouraging index-only scans |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-09-06 01:10:06 | Re: [PERFORM] encouraging index-only scans |