Re: Draft release notes complete

From: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Draft release notes complete
Date: 2012-05-10 12:57:01
Message-ID: CAK3UJREtyPr7fcwvWsQzpLyS56kkevjyNnrD5D-CABDhYscjag@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> I have completed my draft of the 9.2 release notes, and committed it to
> git.  I am waiting for our development docs to build, but after 40
> minutes, I am still waiting:

This bit:
Previously supplied years and year masks of less than four digits
wrapped inconsistently.

I first read as "Previously-supplied years..." instead of "Previously,
years and year masks with...".

In line with what Robert said, IMO he should be credited on
pg_opfamily_is_visible(), particularly since it was his idea and code
originally IIRC. And a few more I'm familiar with with, such as psql's
\ir which he substantially revised, not to mention his
much-appreciated assistance with all the psql comment-displaying under
'E.1.3.9.2.1. Comments'.

Josh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2012-05-10 13:04:21 Re: incorrect handling of the timeout in pg_receivexlog
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-05-10 12:45:21 Re: Draft release notes complete