From: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adam Cornett <adam(dot)cornett(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Marc Mamin <M(dot)Mamin(at)intershop(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: What do you like to get ? |
Date: | 2011-09-16 13:46:05 |
Message-ID: | CAK3UJRERNb=WqsAKFqaiy17mW5W2R3dHEPzBgq=AF0PXzAEHJQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Adam Cornett <adam(dot)cornett(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> This sounds like something that should be in the Postgres wiki
> (http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki) not sure if there is a page (a quick
> search didn't turn one up).
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Marc Mamin <M(dot)Mamin(at)intershop(dot)de> wrote:
>> I miss a discussion place for feature wishes. (Is there one ?)
Well, there is the Todo list, http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo
But AFAIK there's not a wiki page for users to add or talk about
feature requests; that page says "Please do not add items here without
discussion on the mailing list." And often things mentioned on-list
fall through the cracks, as people aren't motivated enough to build
consensus by asking "Is this a TODO?", then adding to that list. I
don't know that a separate mailing list for such topics would be
helpful or used, but I think a less-official wiki page that users were
free to edit would be helpful. Maybe it could look like this:
http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Feature_Requests
One feature I'd be interested in is something like an ON STARTUP
trigger, i.e. a way to run some function upon server start. This might
be useful in conjunction with unlogged tables, e.g. you might want to
queue a refresh of a materialized view after a server crash. There are
plenty more, too. If someone wants to start a wiki page, I'll help.
Josh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2011-09-16 13:53:54 | Re: forcing table ownership |
Previous Message | Radosław Smogura | 2011-09-16 13:41:48 | Re: Alternative JDBC driver |