Replacing Apache Solr with Postgre Full Text Search?

From: J2eeInside J2eeInside <j2eeinside(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Replacing Apache Solr with Postgre Full Text Search?
Date: 2020-03-25 12:36:38
Message-ID: CAK-aFFb=Xur5e9y758G1Qh_h8+7b+kME=Wd3vREkbEL3HcB=-g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi all,

I hope someone can help/suggest:
I'm currently maintaining a project that uses Apache Solr /Lucene. To be
honest, I wold like to replace Solr with Postgre Full Text Search. However,
there is a huge amount of documents involved - arround 200GB. Wondering,
can Postgre handle this efficiently?
Does anyone have specific experience, and what should the infrastructure
look like?

P.S. Not to be confused, the Sol works just fine, i just wanted to
eliminate one component from the whole system (if Full text search can
replace Solr at all)

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2020-03-25 12:41:52 Re: How to plpgsql scripting
Previous Message Ekaterina Amez 2020-03-25 12:20:23 How to plpgsql scripting