From: | Maxim Boguk <maxim(dot)boguk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17870: Analyze on remote postgresql_fdw table never finish |
Date: | 2023-03-28 06:34:32 |
Message-ID: | CAK-MWwQ+V5BTww8B3egQ1y2WTwzxsmw3pJNW3RUxV-bPUQNNkw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 1:43 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > Is it expected that the analyze of foreign table will fetch whole table
> to
> > local size (quite a task for 2TB table)?
>
> Yes. There's an improvement in the works for v16 (8ad51b5f4).
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Thank you for an explanation.
So using use_remote_estimate only way to work with huge fdw tables atm.
Is this behaviour of analyze over fdw documented somewhere?
--
Maxim Boguk
Senior Postgresql DBA
https://dataegret.com/
Phone UA: +380 99 143 0000
Phone AU: +61 45 218 5678
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Regmi | 2023-03-28 10:57:34 | Fwd: NEED RPM FILE OF LATEST POSTGRE supported for AIX 7.2 |
Previous Message | Maxim Boguk | 2023-03-28 06:28:04 | Re: BUG #17871: JIT during postgresql_fdw remote_estimates EXPLAIN have very negatively effect on planning time |