> If you want an audit comparison point, I'd suggest capturing
> the result of pg_get_functiondef or one of its sibling functions
> just after creating your function. "pg_dump -s" is another
> pretty credible mechanism for capturing schema details.
That's very good info, thank you. I guess freaking out was unnecessary. Sorry.
So the idea is to do apples to apples comparison and forget the sql source files
with whitespace and comments. When comparing a know good database
I can do pg_get_functiondef in both databases and compare the results.
It's just a matter of how well each query tool can represent diffs or
do results
comparison. pg_dump output is even better for comparison.
Pasi