From: | Mark Rofail <markm(dot)rofail(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |
Date: | 2017-07-27 19:08:51 |
Message-ID: | CAJvoCuuDJowgZvxJWWn=pB0QZTF6WC1bCG=uity8XmqTwEAk6g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
> It would help (me at least) if you could be more explicit about what
> exactly each instance is.
>
I apologize, I thought it was clear through the context.
I meant by the original patch is all the work done before my GSoC project.
The latest of which, was submitted by Tom Lane[1]. And rebased here[2].
The new patch is the latest one submitted by me[3].
And the new patch with index is the same[3], but with a GIN index built
over it. CREATE INDEX ON fktableforarray USING gin (fktest array_ops);
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/28617.1351095467@sss.pgh.pa.us
[2]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJvoCutcMEYNFYK8Hdiui-M2y0ZGg%3DBe17fHgQ%3D8nHexZ6ft7w%40mail.gmail.com
[3]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJvoCuuoGo5zJTpmPm90doYTUWoeUc%2BONXK2%2BH_vxsi%2BZi09bQ%40mail.gmail.com
Best Regards,
Mark Rofail
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Rofail | 2017-07-27 19:15:28 | Re: GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-07-27 18:58:58 | Re: Change in "policy" on dump ordering? |