From: | Mark Rofail <markm(dot)rofail(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |
Date: | 2017-06-28 21:49:16 |
Message-ID: | CAJvoCuteMR26cDNkHEOOCSctuCKemx6ex1hFR0yuqy7RMjb8AA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Have you met any particular problem here? Or is it just a lot of
> mechanical work?
>
Just A LOT of mechanictal work, thankfully. The patch is now rebased and
all regress tests have passed (even the element_foreign_key). Please find
the patch below !
I don't think it is bug.
>
That's good news !
*What I plan to do next *
- study ri_triggers.c (src/backend/utils/adt/ri_triggers.c) since this
is where the new RI code will reside
Best Regards,
Mark Rofail
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
Array-ELEMENT-foreign-key-v2-REBASED-f0256c7.patch | text/x-patch | 109.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-06-28 22:23:46 | Re: Fast promotion not used when doing a recovery_target PITR restore? |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-06-28 20:19:32 | Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken |