From: | Mark Rofail <markm(dot)rofail(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |
Date: | 2018-08-11 03:20:57 |
Message-ID: | CAJvoCusp=5qmXO6UbAgU+72H3h5fy0PrriyCo1JnNQLB5hybSw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I am still having problems rebasing this patch. I can not figure it out on
my own.
On Sun, 27 May 2018 at 5:31 pm, Mark Rofail <markm(dot)rofail(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> issue 1: `pg_constraint.c:564`
> I need to check that `conppeqop` is not null and copy it but I don't know
> how to check its type since its a char*
>
> issue 2: `matview.c:768`
> I need to pass `fkreftype` but I don't have it in the rest of the functIon
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:31 AM, Mark Rofail <markm(dot)rofail(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> I was wondering if anyone knows the proper way to write a benchmarking
>> test for the @>> operator. I used the below script in my previous attempt
>> https://gist.github.com/markrofail/174ed370a2f2ac24800fde2fc27e2d38
>> The script does the following steps:
>>
>> 1. Generate Table A with 5 rows
>> 2. Generate Table B with n rows such as:
>> every row of Table B is an array of IDs referencing rows in Table A.
>>
>> The tests we ran previously had Table B up to 1 million rows and the
>> results can be seen here :
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJvoCusMuLnYZUbwTBKt%2Bp6bB9GwiTqF95OsQFHXixJj3LkxVQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>
>> How would we change this so it would be more exhaustive and accurate?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mark Rofail
>>
>>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2018-08-11 03:32:58 | Re: [sqlsmith] ERROR: partition missing from subplans |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2018-08-11 03:11:32 | Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes |