From: | Rémi Cura <remi(dot)cura(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: excution time for plpgsql function and subfunction |
Date: | 2014-01-13 11:30:28 |
Message-ID: | CAJvUf_t17EdCWRHjD3ERWgeJ58pmH_2vt6w4pb=hAFV1w948Yw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks all =)
Cheers,
Rémi-C
2014/1/13 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
> On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 10:10 +0100, Rémi Cura wrote:
> > Hey List,
> > kind of a simple question :
> >
> > I'm using the postgis_topology extension,
> > and I'm trying to figure where the slowness comes from when importing
> data.
> >
> > It involves plpgsql function calling other plpgsql functions, insert,
> > update, etc etc.
> >
> > I know I can use explain analyze for one querry, but I don't know how to
> > get details of how much time takes each sub-function called by a main
> > function.
> >
> > Thus it is very difficult to guess where is the bottleneck.
> >
>
> Shameless plug, but here is how I do it:
>
> http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info/index.php/post/2012/03/31/Profiling-PL/pgsql-functions
>
>
> --
> Guillaume
> http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
> http://www.dalibo.com
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | sramay | 2014-01-13 12:53:50 | Re: pg_largeobject related issue with 9.2 |
Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2014-01-13 11:24:20 | Re: excution time for plpgsql function and subfunction |