| From: | Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Logical replication of large objects |
| Date: | 2022-06-09 18:24:56 |
| Message-ID: | CAJvJg-Q+z7wDY4JML85gzgg1ZWb6jizmrpY+P6=W_6gW5na81w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Large objects are largely considered a deprecated feature.
Though I like the idea, was there any consensus on -hackers?
JD
On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 2:23 AM Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
wrote:
> I started this thread 5 years ago:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/7c70d9bd-76fc-70fa-cfec-14f00a4a49c3%40matrix.gatewaynet.com#15cbf1c82be9341e551e60e287264380
>
>
>
> We'd be willing to help funding development needed to support Large Object
> logical replication.
>
> Anyone interested?
>
>
> --
> *Andreas Joseph Krogh*
> CTO / Partner - Visena AS
> Mobile: +47 909 56 963
> andreas(at)visena(dot)com
> www.visena.com
> <https://www.visena.com>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 2022-06-09 18:58:05 | Re: Logical replication of large objects |
| Previous Message | Joshua Drake | 2022-06-09 17:23:16 | Re: Sharing DSA pointer between parallel workers after they've been created |