Re: Hash tables in dynamic shared memory

From: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John Gorman <johngorman2(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hash tables in dynamic shared memory
Date: 2016-12-05 00:24:47
Message-ID: CAJrrPGePmdONYKnJPCKRE_3_uvsAspQ9J28nuOw=q2tsdVg1iw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 9:54 AM, John Gorman <johngorman2(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I reviewed the dht-v2.patch and found that it is in excellent shape.
>
> The overall performance will be faster due to not having to examine
> more than one hash bucket array most of the time.
>
>
Reviewer didn't find any problems in the approach of the patch. Provided
some
improvements on the approach to the author to respond.

Moved to next CF with "waiting on author" state.

Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haribabu Kommi 2016-12-05 00:30:36 Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-12-04 23:45:54 Re: patch: function xmltable