Re: IPv6 link-local addresses and init data type

From: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: IPv6 link-local addresses and init data type
Date: 2016-05-31 00:37:46
Message-ID: CAJrrPGdPP2deimawEQh_=upbaP5RgO+Qdr_mmEUim+xDz5Zy9Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc> wrote:
>
>> On 31 May 2016, at 2:07 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>> The impression I have is that scopes are not very well standardized ---
>> eg, OS X reports things like "fe80::1%lo0" not just "%0". If we could
>> get around that problem it would be worth doing.

The following is the content of IPV6 representation from RFC 4007

The following addresses

fe80::1234 (on the 1st link of the node)
ff02::5678 (on the 5th link of the node)
ff08::9abc (on the 10th organization of the node)

would be represented as follows:

fe80::1234%1
ff02::5678%5
ff08::9abc%10

(Here we assume a natural translation from a zone index to the
<zone_id> part, where the Nth zone of any scope is translated into
"N".)

If we use interface names as <zone_id>, those addresses could also be
represented as follows:

fe80::1234%ne0
ff02::5678%pvc1.3
ff08::9abc%interface10

The digit and string both are considered as proper format.

>
> Yeah, we’d have to just store it as a string I think. That’s why I was happy to see that inet was already a varlena but only with known-length content.

The % delimiter character is not only used at the end of the IPV6 address,
from the RFC document, it is possible as follows also.

fe80::%2/64

we need to handle both the scenarios, it may not be a straight
forward to store the zone id data.

Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-05-31 00:39:06 Re: Reviewing freeze map code
Previous Message Kouhei Kaigai 2016-05-31 00:01:21 Re: Does people favor to have matrix data type?