Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers

From: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers
Date: 2016-12-05 02:38:26
Message-ID: CAJrrPGcO8XPNHNuOmrpFTtj8=5tWwgSBbmEfR53dFx_g3efYYg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> No, that is not true. You have quoted the wrong message, that
> discussion was about WALWriteLock contention not about the patch being
> discussed in this thread. I have posted the latest set of patches
> here [1]. Tomas is supposed to share the results of his tests. He
> mentioned to me in PGConf Asia last week that he ran few tests on
> Power Box, so let us wait for him to share his findings.
>
> > Moved to next CF with "waiting on author" status. Please feel free to
> > update the status if the current status differs with the actual patch
> > status.
> >
>
> I think we should keep the status as "Needs Review".
>
> [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1JjatUZu0%
> 2BHCi%3D5VM1q-hFgN_OhegPAwEUJqxf-7pESbg%40mail.gmail.com

Thanks for the update.
I changed the status to "needs review" in 2017-01 commitfest.

Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haribabu Kommi 2016-12-05 02:41:13 Re: Creating a DSA area to provide work space for parallel execution
Previous Message Haribabu Kommi 2016-12-05 02:37:11 Re: identity columns