Re: [REVIEW] macaddr 64 bit (EUI-64) datatype support

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:20 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:

> Greetings Hari Babu,
>
> * Haribabu Kommi (kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
> wrote:
> > > And, naturally, re-reading the email as it hit the list made me realize
> > > that the documentation/error-message incorrectly said "3rd and 4th"
> > > bytes were being set to FF and FE, when it's actually the 4th and 5th
> > > byte. The code was correct, just the documentation and the error
> > > message had the wrong numbers. The commit message is also correct.
> >
> > Thanks for the review and corrections.
> >
> > I found some small corrections.
> >
> > s/4rd/4th/g -- Type correction.
> >
> > + Input is accepted in the following formats:
> >
> > As we are supporting many different input variants, and all combinations
> > are not listed, so how about changing the above statement as below.
> >
> > "Following are the some of the input formats that are accepted:"
>
> Good points, I incorporated them along with a bit of additional
> information in the documentation as to what we do actually support.
>
> > I didn't find any other problems during testing and review. The patch
> > is fine.
>
> Great! I've committed this now. If you see anything additional or
> other changes which should be made, please let me know.
>
> ... and bumped catversion after (thanks for the reminder, Robert!).
>

Thanks for the review and changes.

Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia