| From: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: promotion related handling in pg_sync_replication_slots() |
| Date: | 2024-04-16 08:22:39 |
| Message-ID: | CAJpy0uDCbxzTUL8k2A9-MKj37A8cQ_zdpxU7hqJj_di370yceg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 12:03 PM Bertrand Drouvot
<bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I think for now let's restrict their usage in parallel and make the
> > promotion behavior consistent both for worker and API.
>
> Okay, let's do it that way. Is it worth to add a few words in the doc related to
> pg_sync_replication_slots() though? (to mention it can not be used if the sync
> slot worker is running).
+1. Please find v6 having the suggested doc changes.
thanks
Shveta
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v6-0001-Handle-stopSignaled-during-sync-function-call.patch | application/octet-stream | 11.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) | 2024-04-16 08:25:32 | RE: promotion related handling in pg_sync_replication_slots() |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-04-16 08:17:26 | Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? |