From: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
Date: | 2024-03-26 09:22:11 |
Message-ID: | CAJpy0uChMjAPNzWVsxvZHPbXFr2BQSi+dxYO3Hg0F=fkEsvdaQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 2:27 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >
> > 1)
> > Commti msg:
> >
> > ensures the value is set to current timestamp during the
> > shutdown to help correctly interpret the time if the standby gets
> > promoted without a restart.
> >
> > shutdown --> shutdown of slot sync worker (as it was not clear if it
> > is instance shutdown or something else)
>
> Changed it to "shutdown of slot sync machinery" to be consistent with
> the comments.
Thanks for addressing the comments. Just to give more clarity here (so
that you take a informed decision), I am not sure if we actually shut
down slot-sync machinery. We only shot down slot sync worker.
Slot-sync machinery can still be used using
'pg_sync_replication_slots' SQL function. I can easily reproduce the
scenario where SQL function and reset_synced_slots_info() are going
in parallel where the latter hits 'Assert(s->active_pid == 0)' due to
the fact that parallel SQL sync function is active on that slot.
thanks
Shveta
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Étienne BERSAC | 2024-03-26 09:22:34 | Re: REVOKE FROM warning on grantor |
Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2024-03-26 09:04:33 | Re: pgsql: Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots. |