Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation

From: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Date: 2024-03-28 03:46:17
Message-ID: CAJpy0uBB+6Y-C16r0vmYSNcFcCOqF6L3kgmvkGF0vjXfMgxswA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 9:00 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thanks. I'm attaching v29 patches. 0001 managing inactive_since on the
> standby for sync slots. 0002 implementing inactive timeout GUC based
> invalidation mechanism.
>
> Please have a look.

Thanks for the patches. v29-001 looks good to me.

thanks
Shveta

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2024-03-28 04:38:19 RE: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2024-03-28 03:19:49 Re: DOCS: add helpful partitioning links