From: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Make default subscription streaming option as Parallel |
Date: | 2024-10-08 10:50:04 |
Message-ID: | CAJpy0uAEiWXaakSqhwS2cyH2e_WDBGG+XSrsKTvTzm5P6+WmJA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 3:38 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 2:25 PM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 4:03 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > With parallel streaming as default, do you think there is a need to
> > increase the default for 'max_logical_replication_workers' as IIUC
> > parallel workers are taken from the same pool.
> >
>
> Good question. But then one may say that we should proportionately
> increase max_worker_processes as well. I don't know what should be
> reasonable new defaults.
Agreed on the same query on the next level of max_worker_processes .
> I think we should make parallel streaming as
> default and then wait for some user feedback before changing other
> defaults.
>
Okay, sounds good to me. It is not a blocking factor anyway, user can
always change it to a higher value in case his requirement is like
that.
thanks
Shveta
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yugo NAGATA | 2024-10-08 10:51:23 | Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes |
Previous Message | Antonin Houska | 2024-10-08 10:46:49 | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |