Re: Question about attention to pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org

From: Imre Samu <pella(dot)samu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: A Z <poweruserm(at)live(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question about attention to pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2022-06-27 10:41:01
Message-ID: CAJnEWwneHXwzpJXw776Kx1K594PHRwJ_Ten9NphYr9weKfjoGw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

From the original post
"-This whole system will uphold any precision, certainly ones within a very
large range limit, controlled by the already available type for large
positive integers, the BIGINT. It can thereby enumerate digits within the
range of
(+/-)1 to (+/-)9,223,372,036,854,775,807. This is at least between one and
positive nine quintilion digit places. More than enough for the speed and
scope of today, or maybe tomorrow, and the Desktop PC, as either a client
or a server."

As I know PostgreSQL 14 "field" size upper limit : 1 GB ~= 1 000 000 000
byte ( 1 byte --> 2 digits )
so this is a hard limitation on the PostgreSQL side.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/limits.html

proposal for the first iteration:
- just using the Postgres "numeric" type ( "up to 131072 digits before the
decimal point; up to 16383 digits after the decimal point" )
and it will be so much easier.

> I was wondering if anyone can or will pay some active attention to it?

Why is this important to you?
How are you expected to contribute to the proposed project?
What technical background do you have?

Regards,
Imre

A Z <poweruserm(at)live(dot)com(dot)au> ezt írta (időpont: 2022. jún. 26., V, 12:37):

> Dear pgsql-general,
>
> I have successfully sent an (updated) email list message to
>
> *pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>*
>
> which can be viewed in the archive here:
>
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Rm7WBtZZpYL1NWuunuN_16EY0JcyejqV22z_JlUfvD5FYPenGDd_ZGUddwAcMNi2KNSyvqAhBRzj2JxtJoNmWAzykBQU4Z1AzBp0GPs8wZQ=@protonmail.com
>
> I was wondering if anyone can or will pay some active attention to it?
> i.e. what can I do from here to raise the message there to the attention
> of more people involved with pgsql-hackers, in order to get one or more
> active email replies in response to what I have posed/asked?
>
> *My email address is poweruserm(at)live(dot)com(dot)au <poweruserm(at)live(dot)com(dot)au>*,
>
> and my online name for the post is
>
> *Sergio Minervini*.
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wolfgang Rißler 2022-06-27 11:00:45 Re: Differences in Escaped bytea's when creating a plain pg_dump
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2022-06-27 10:28:18 Re: help for pg_wal issue